
What is money? Everyone talks about it, but what is it exactly? Why did we created it the first place? A lot of people seem to blame money for all the problems in the world, and yet "money makes the world go round".
In order to truly understand what is happening today, we must first explore how money came to be, and the purpose it serves.
In primitive human societies, humans were all hunters, with no or little/simple tools, so there was no real specialization. These people barely had enough in order to survive - nothing more.This is why there was no private property, or trade transactions (some primitive races in places like the Amazon still live in such a state).
But then humans began to improve their tools and weapons, and they also developed agriculture as well, which was a huge leap forward. It today's terms, people become more productive, and "specialization" started to appear, as some people became "professional farmers", some others were "professional craftsman" creating tools etc. For the first time in history, there were different "professions" - this "specialization" allowed people to become more productive in more and more tasks, and every "professional" (eg farmer, hunter, builder, craftsman, etc) was not self-sufficient, but also relied on others in order to live a better life.
By increasing productivity, humanity could create more wealth than before, and by increasing specialization some people (eg the farmers) had a surplus of wheat, and some other people (eg the craftsmen) had a surplus of tools or clothes. So, this is when private property firsts appears, and trade starts to grow, as one person exchanges "something that belongs to him" with "something else" that belongs to "someone else".
This barter system had some problems however: For example, some products are not easy to carry, or they don't last long (food is a good example, as it must be consumed within a few days). Furthermore, as specialization deepens, there are more and more trade transactions.
This is why people turned to something else, a "super-product" that could be used as a benchmark for all other products: Money. All other goods have a value that could now be expressed through it.
Mankind has used many different forms of money, but gold (and secondarily silver) is the form that dominated over all the other forms. The reason is that gold is durable, easily transferable from one place to another and rare. Many other forms of money where tried, but nothing could beat gold's advantages as money.

Today, specialization has grown to an incredible degree - capitalism has created an international system, where everyone is more or less dependent on others from around the world in order to live a good life. When such systems collapse, humanity suffers greatly - here's Tony Jackson from the Financial Times:
Four years ago, I related in this column how a stockbroker acquaintance of mine had likened the outlook to 1929. A couple of weeks ago he was back on the phone. Forget 1929, he said: we are looking at the Dark Ages.Unless capitalism is overthrown, and private property is abolished, capitalism is about to send us in a new "Dark Age”, as antagonisms create trade wars, protectionism and full-scale military wars. We are dependent on each other, but we are divided by a handful of oligarchs, who don't produce anything but exploit us, grabbing an ever-increasing part of the wealth for themselves, leaving nothing but crumbs for us to fight over.
The Dark Ages, of course, are something else again. But let me repeat here what I said four years ago: that the purpose of such comparisons is not to indulge in fancies about history repeating itself, but to expand our conception of the possible.
Quantifying the effects of the collapse of the Roman Empire is not an exact science. But from the start to the finish of the first millenium AD, according to the economic historian Angus Maddison, the economy of Western Europe shrank by around a quarter, and that of Italy itself by nearly half.
What this meant for Britain has been spelt out by the Oxford historian Bryan Ward-Perkins. After the Romans left in 410 AD, the archaeological record suggests that the economy slumped to a much more primitive level than on their arrival nearly 400 years earlier.
The reason is clear enough. The more complex and specialised an economy becomes, the more helpless its individuals are in the face of breakdown. The Romans introduced a higher level of complexity to Britain, then took it back home again.
It is here that parallels with today start to look rather stretched. But the theme of periodic collapse is perhaps borne out by the longer historical record.
We will talk more about this in the future, but for now let's get back to the history of money, as gold ("money") has today been replaced by "currency".

Money and currency are two different things - and the fact that most people thing of them as being the same thing is one of the great misconceptions of our time.
When the Roman Empire collapsed, the coins it was issuing as currency had no silver in them (the Romans used silver, not gold). As it has happened many times before in history, gold has today been replaced by fiat currencies. We will discuss the reasons for this in future posts over the next few days.
For now, we will discuss something else:
If today's currency is not money (gold), and there is no gold standard to link these two, then what holds these currencies together? There is not enough gold to back all of them up (at least not in today's exchange rates), so what does back them up?
These currencies are 100% based on faith ("trust"). Faith is always an important factor in capitalism and in the monetary plane in particular, but today's currency in circulation is of value purely because the world believes that they are. If people stop believing that they are "of value", then the value of these currencies will go down to zero. Today's currency is ultimately nothing more than pieces of paper with some beautiful images and the signature of the Trichets and Bernankes of the world.
How much do you trust their signature?
Many say that "gold is a bubble" or "i am not interested in investing my money in gold because i do not want to invest, I want my money to be stable and not having to worry about how my investment will perform".
In reality, these people have no money. They only have currency.
All of humanity is today participating in an "experiment" where we are all investors, even without realizing it. We are by default investing our money in various currencies (apart from all the other investments that someone can make such as shares, etc).
These currencies, like any other investment, can rise and fall - maybe you will make a profit if the currency you use rises, or even completely lose your money (if the value of the currency in which you invest goes to zero (hyperinflation)).
In contrast, gold is money (not currency), and it remains constant. In fact, it is the only thing that remains constant. Its value has never gone down to zero in the thousand of years that it has been used as money, and actually it has not changed much. Gold just stays constant, as a storage of wealth.
As for the value of gold against all the currencies breaking one record after another, it is not because gold is rising, but because the currencies are falling.
So, anyone looking for stability and wanting to protect his wealth, will actually have to resort to gold.
Unfortunately, most people are economically illiterate (the ruling class has made sure of it for it, and the today's "left" has not done much better). This is why most people think that that the currency is what remains constant, and that gold is what is changing. This way of thinking suits the ruling class, which is why they propagate it, as it enables them to steal from people by inflating the currency, without the people realizing it (since in the minds of most people, the currency is stable, and gold is "an investment" that may or may not do well. Most people do not want to invest their money, they just want to store it, so they choose currency over gold, when if fact gold is what they are looking for stability-wise).
Someone could argue that maybe the dollar, the euro or some other currency will actually do well - if they do, then maybe it is better for someone to own currency instead of money (gold). And if the economy is growing, then this is true - for the short term at least: If you decide to invest your money and start a business, maybe this business will do well, and you will become a rich person with lots of money. But what happens if your business does not go well?
“Don’t be a pessimist”, some will say, maybe businesses will do well in the future.
In today's environment however, this is impossible - and here's why:
We have already explained that after the fall of the USSR, and the integration of China in the global market, the productive base of the West is being wiped out because industrial capitalists are fleeing to Asia (mainly because of cheap labor costs which make them more competitive).
The West would have collapsed, if it wasn't for all the loans the banks have been giving out, in order to "mask" the flight of industrial capital.
But these loans can not be repaid, so the West now has a very small productive sector, and it is also loaded with huge debts (and of course the ruling class wants us to pay for them, while they are getting "bailed out").
Since these loans can not be repaid, banks are insolvent (like Lehman Brothers was).
The only way for the global banking system not to go bankrupt, governments around the world are printing massive amounts of "money" (currency), and giving it out to the banks.
This process is possible because there are no limits to the amount of currency that the governments can print. There is no gold standard, so they will print as much as they need in order to save the banks. The banks are their friends, not "the people". So, they obviously have the political will to "print until we run out of paper". The derivatives market alone is worth 700 trillion $ according to Marketwatch, so we will see a lot of "money" printing over the next few years.
But as governments are printing huge amounts of "money", the value of this "money" is falling - this is why gold is making such a comeback after decades of being considered as "a fringe investment"
This policy of unlimited "money" printing is supported primarily by banks, but it is also supported by the industrial capitalists as well, because the more the currency depreciates, the lower the salary of the worker becomes. Thus, labor costs become smaller, and "competitiveness" is restored, so exports rise.
All states want to save their banks and to enhance their exports against foreign competitors - so all states print money. Hence the phrase "currency wars", with each state competing against the others in a game of who will devalue their currency more than their competitors.

But the more "money" governments print, the more people's thinking about them changes.
The U.S. dollar, euro, yen, etc. have value because people think that they do and they use them. But as these currencies are being inflated, people are starting to think that "these currencies are becoming worthless" (and this is why ordinary citizens, and -especially- central banks of the non-Western world are buying gold at an increasing rate - see here, here and here for some examples of this trend).
And this is also why the oil oligarchs who control humanity's #1 source of energy, but are paid exclusively in dollars are against the USA - because they do not want to be paid in a currency when its value is constantly falling (this is why the oil crisis of 1973 happened: It took place shortly after the abolition of the gold standard by Nixon. The oil states did not want to be paid in dollars but in gold. This is something that has to be discussed in more detail in future posts. However, it is interesting to note that Saddam Hussein, Qaddafi and Ahmadinejad were all trying to sell their oil in a currency other than the dollar...).
This process of "moving away" from the dollar as the world's reserve currency (and all the other fiat currencies as well) will continue, as more and more people start to realize that the value of all currencies is constantly falling. So, sooner or later, people will reject these currencies, because nobody wants a currency when he knows that the value of it is constantly falling. Then, there will be chaos as everyone will try to convert all of their currencies to money, ie in gold. [note: Before that happens, we will first witness the destruction of the "paper gold" market that capitalists have created. But "paper gold" is something that we haven't yet discussed, so i'll just leave it as a sidenote for now)
Many riches will be lost (because they is "paper"), while some others who are more "awake" who own gold will escape the real bubble (ie currencies). Gold is the only thing that will remain "stable" when the rest of the monetary system is destroyed and replaced by a new one, in which clearly gold will play a central role.
As for the future of the workers, it is dystopic to say the least, unless they organize in order to overthrow their masters - even if they do find a job, they will be paid in [hyper]inflated currencies (a tremendous reduction in wages).
Of course, the transfer of wealth and power from the U.S. and the West to China, Russia (the Est), will probably not be allowed to continue in a "peaceful" fashion. The U.S. will not fall without a fight, especially since their military machine is the only thing that they have going for them. Wars may be expensive, but they are also the only thing that keeps the rest of the world in place, as all the oil states are forced to use dollars as a "means of payment" for their oil. This is the only thing that keeps the dollar and the USA going (Russia and China are already rejecting the dollar - they are buying gold and they are using their own currencies for the exchanges between them. Even Japan, a traditional US ally, decided to use its own currency in its transactions with China instead of the dollar).
Good post, much better than all the technical analysis you usually get these days...
ReplyDeleteExcellent post. I already knew the truth about gold, but you explain why inflation is going to get much worse soon due mainly to China, etc - you explain that very well ! However it is important to note that even before China became capitalist, inflation occurred although to a lessor extent. Inflation is just a hidden tax that benefits bankers who then reward their puppet politicians who allow them to continue the grandest theft unchecked.
ReplyDeleteHowever it is also important to remember that all this theft cannot merely be blamed on capitalism. A country that is healthy economically and socially usually has a good blend of socialist and capitalist policies in place. However pure capitalism or pure communism usually ends in disaster so I cannot agree that communism is the solution.
The communists raped Russia and Eastern Europe and you'll find if you dig deep enough that communism was started by greedy, capitalist New York based bankers, under the guise of helping the worker, but set out from the started to exploit and murder the worker, and even more so the middle and upper classes from where they would take all the wealth. That is actually part of the reason why the capitalist world is now in crisis - since the private capitalist bankers who secretly funded communism have worked for centuries to get control of America and turn upside down what the founding fathers of America sought to create.
Since communism was founded it was used as a big "bogey" man to those in the West to scare them into giving away more of their freedoms to the own banker controlled governments and to create wars and revolutions in other parts of the world, where capitalist funded one side and communists the other side all to the benefit or arms companies, most likely owned by the bankers or their allies, who made vast fortunes selling armaments all at expense of human life and tax payers money. Most modern wars are fought for this reason and not so much "to plunder and loot" as in the old days.
ReplyDeleteThe bankers rule the world through ruthless capitalism and ruthless communism which they pretend to oppose in a massive propaganda campaign they called the "cold war". Even communism needs funding (capital) and it was these "Western" bankers who financed the Russian Revolution ! There have been many books written on this naming the financiers by name.
Do a Google search to see who funded communism.
ReplyDeletePS - these "Western" bankers originate from "the east" and came from Eastern Europe - and before that from Mongolia. They have no allegiance whatsoever to the West although many people consider them to be culturally "western". Their intention is to build up China and "the East" at the expense and destruction of the West.
ReplyDeleteI urge you to read Marx's Communist manifesto, and also the history of the Paris Commune - if you do, you will see that the vision of communism had little to do with what happened in Russia (state capitalism).
ReplyDeleteBut this is obviously a very long discussion, and perhaps we can resume it in the future, when i write a few posts about this subject.
Marx's communist manifesto might seem genuinely contructive and in good faith, but thats exactly what Marx wanted the world to think. That's exactly how propaganda works, that's how mass manipulators and politicians work (most of them). They promise one thing and do another. Marx was just another communist with a grand plan to allow corrupt communists to take over the world. I'm sorry to burst your bubble, but its true. The capitalist financiers in the west who hated the Tzars were behind him 100% and that's were all the capital came from.
ReplyDeleteCommunism was never "an honourable movement of the people that just happened to turn horribly wrong" as the history books petend. It was always rotten from the start. The Tzarist monarchies - however wealthy - were one of the most liberal monarchies in Europe. How many communist terorists did they imprison and then release again ? How many were allowed to read newspapers and treated well while they were in prison and their communist brethren were spreading propaganda and conspiring assasinaions ? That is why the communists won in the end - if they had suppressed the communists and the general people as badly as the history books like to explain, they would never have lost power. Russia was home to millions of illiterate peasants before the germanic Tzars even arrived in Russia and build a beutiful Christian civilisation there - they were therefore always envied and hated by the hordes tht preceded them and those of these hordes that were the most devious and bloodthirty were those that became communists. The poor will alway hate the rich and the uneducated will always hate noblemen - it is in human nature. Except possibly in England, where the British people have always loved their Royal family.
ReplyDeleteCommunism as an ideology was funded by the Talmudic Rabbis / International Bankers as a smoke screen to impose their Talmudic principals upon the world under the guise of "avenging equality"
ReplyDeleteThose same bankers, Jacob Schiff (Rothschild agent ) of Kuhn Loeb and company (2 blocks from the FED in NYC ) gave Lenin 20 million to terrorize Russia.
Lenin and his Bolsheviks, in true Talmudic fashion killed 66 million Russians and destroyed Christianity and Russian culture.
-Wad
"capitalism is about to send us in a new "Dark Age”"
ReplyDeleteThis is not correct and is a common error. It is not "capitalism" that is about to send us "anywhere" as what we have is now is certainly not "capitalism".
It still amazes me how many people do not even have a definition for what "capitalism" is. (I do).
Money is a good readily acceptable in exchange by everyone in a given geographical area and is sought for the purpose of being re-exchanged. (George Reisman, "Capitalism - A Treatise on Economics", Ottawa, Illinois: Jameson books, 1998. 3rd ed. p. 142)
ReplyDeleteVERSUS
"Money" is a dead, meaningless concept. If you want to use it, then define it.
Circulating Currency has a concrete meaning.
(FOFOA, "Windmills, Paper Tigers, Straw Men and Fallacious Fallacies, December 28, 2010
http://fofoa.blogspot.com/2010/12/windmills-paper-tigers-straw-men-and.html
Gold emerged as money [Ivo: yes, but "is" it money?] not through a social contract
but through the spontaneous convergence of the choices of many individuals.
(Jörg Guido Hülsmann, "The Ethics of Money Production", Auburn, Alabama, Ludwig von Mises Institute, 2008, p. 23 paraphrase)
There were authors who tried to explain the origin of money by decree or covenant. The authority, the state, or a compact between citizens has purposively and consciously established indirect exchange and money. [Carl Menger showed] the main deficiency of this method.
(Ludwig von Mises, "Human Action - A Treatise on Economics", Chicago, Contemporary Books, 1966, (originally published 1949), 3rd. rev. ed., p. 405)
Carl Menger discovered that institutions appear through a social process, composed of a multiplicity of human actions, which is always led by a relatively small group of individuals who, in their particular historical and geographical circumstances, are the first ones to discover that certain patterns of behaviour help them achieve their goals more efficiently.
((Jesús Huerta de Soto, "Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles", Auburn, Alabama, Ludwig von Mises Institute, 2009, 2nd ed.,., p. 21)
"Monnaie courante" in French means "common practice",
"courir" in French is "currere" in Latin of which the present participle is "currens"
I submit that that’s the etymological origin of the word "currency" –
the adjective becoming the noun in English - also for John Locke.
Etymonline.com says that the etymology of "currency" which I have traced back to "monnaie courante" goes back to the 1650s, where it referred to " he condition of flowing," from the Latin "currens", present participle of. "currere" "to run" (see current); [expessed] the sense of a flow or course [and was] extended [in] 1699 (by John Locke (1632 – 17040)) to "circulation of money."
http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=currency
You're a loon. Gold is not an investment. It is not a commodity. It has no use other than to look nice. Yes, currency is based on faith ,but at the same time gold is based on stupidity. The stupidity that if something looks pretty and doesn't erode is must be valuable. It is an elementary fact the value of something is relative and assigned by humans. At the very least though, stocks and bonds invest in growth, economies, and, ultimately, productive potential. That is better than gold, which rises only based on the fluctuation of mass hysteria.
ReplyDeleteYou are the loon ! Gold has industrial used as well and that makes it a commodity. And if you think people will lose faith in it simply because it only "looks nice" you are also wrong. For Millenia it has been valued by countless civilisations without loosing its value simply because it "looks nice" ! How do you explain that ?!
ReplyDeleteThe only thing you are right about is the fact that gold is not really an investment. Investing in gold is an investment to PROTECT your wealth and not really to grow it like with "normal" productive investments like stocks. But why do we need to PROTECT our investment ? Any increase in gold value is usually only a reflection of the weakening, inflated paper currency it is being measured in and any real increase in value of gold due to industrial supply and demand reasons is a bonus for those who "invest" in it.
The "fluxuation of mass hysteria" you speak of is enough to bankrupt you and your stocks - especially in a financial crisis like 1929 or 2008 where millions of companies go broke. This mass hysteria reflects a problem with the artifician manipulation and inflation of paper money not backed by an asset of real value (like gold or property). The dollar has lost far more of its value off the gold standard than on it.
Conclusion: If stock are bought and sold in gold or silver or property or anything backed by real value and not a manipulated paper currency there would be almost no depressions or crisis and maybe then no need to invest in gold. However currently the best investments are those that are hedged with stocks, gold, silver, property, etc.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDelete